User blog comment:Youngcoldnew17/Greely isn't a good narrator either!/@comment-26510374-20190612035816

it's fun to have initially closed-off narrators be vague about details, it gives the reader questions that will make them want to read more! as your story goes on, your closed-off character may gradually let on info. i personally enjoy trying to get into the heads of edgy stoic characters who don't normally display emotion. it can also be interesting for the information to never be fully elaborated upon, leaving the reader wondering after the story ends.

it's also interesting to have an unreliable narrator, who might present their opinion as fact and integrate it as detail in the story (an easy example because i am lazy and it's the first thing i can think of: in my story bambi, the narration is in first-person and occasionally the (unnamed and ungendered) narrator wonders if their kin are out to make them suffer; an instant after they ask themselves this, they immediately confirm it in the narration and go on about how it is the truth). idk if you can do this with greely but i'd say he might have some personal bias about the way of the alphas, considering how his presented personality is, or you could draw some non-canon opinions from a backstory you make for him and present his opinions as fact in the story, leaving the reader to figure out whether it is actually true or not in the interactions he got or will get his opinion from, and the interactions where he displays his opinion :)

sorry for the text wall i was thinking about this today and you don't have to accept my unsolicited advice hklslkgbslkf