Thread:Giveaways32/@comment-43836919-20191125234618/@comment-43678658-20191126184943

Hello! I apologize for not dealing with this situation sooner.

In an argument debating whether something is or isn't real with no evidence pointing towards true or false, no evidence pointing towards it being true always takes precedent over no evidence pointing towards it being untrue. It is a repetitive and roundabout way of attempting to argue when you really have no case at all other than to say "well, you have no evidence it ISN'T true, so I'm right." You could say this about just about anything or anyone that may or may not be real or an event that may or may not have actually occurred. If I were to claim I walked to the moon on foot and someone said I was lying, it would not really prove anything to say in response, "you have no evidence that I didn't do it."

More importantly-- as much as I personally would like to believe in the supernatural-- there is no scientific evidence that what Giveaways32 claims to be is or can ever possibly be accurate. It is severely unlikely for Giveaways32 to be... actually dead or undead in any shape or form.

I assume that the operator of both accounts is the same person, and I assume once more that, having observed these arguments, it is an act for attention.

This counts as impersonation as well as likely trolling. As such, Giveaways32 will be blocked indefinitely for attention-seeking drama-starting and trolling, as they are unlikely to give up this act.

Thank you for attempting to deal with this situation, and I once again apologize for my inaction.