User blog comment:Sealz888/Hello/@comment-27070860-20170111174916

I have not much a opinion on the rules, BUT I have one request; to not confuse criticizm with hating (refering to point 4 & 6)

Some rewievs of stories may be found offencive, but as long as the critic didn't bring racism or sexism in (and Zios forbid, family/irl life problems), he's aloud to have his opinions.

If someone points out parts of the story and/or compares it, it's still their opinion.

exp; This story was written badly, (this) and (that) make no sence, and it's all over the place

Even though it might seam offencive, it's still their opinion and they are aloud to point it out.

I apoligize if i'm boring you with this, but I've been seeing this everywhere; people get their heads in a twist when their work isn't liked.

I'm no saying in any way that this has been happening around the wiki, it's pretty peaceful down here, and people are pretty friendly, but there will be people who speak their opinions openly, good and bad opinions.

If your posting and sharing anything with the internet, you have to be open with criticizm and not be taken down by it. You have to accept that not eveyone enjoys certain works. It's better if you accept the criticizm-but not exactly ignore it; sometimes people point out certain parts you could fix up or work on.

Unless the commenter/friend/poster is being racist, sexist, homophobic (or threatens you in any way) you should go to an admin for that.

So I think 'no discrimination of any sort' should be spoke a bit more clearer.

Again I apoligize for the painfully long note, but latley all my friends (he he, as if i have any) have been annoying me about them getting criticizm, and creating a living war with the person. Therefor i'd much like to avoid that.

If it is in fact something containing racism, sexism, or homophobic (including threats and/or prsonal info) inform a admin/berucat and they will try to help out.