Thread:AccountThatHasToBeLookedAt/@comment-37273038-20181022210950/@comment-30425714-20181023005304

FTFO wrote: AccountThatHasToBeLookedAt wrote: Even then, you still create deconstructive criticism, with your constructive criticism only covering conventions. The only critique on your boards that covers something other than conventions is something to do with gender. Essentially, your criticism provides nothing much. I think you're confusing my comments with my critiques. If you go and look for them, then you'll find my actual critiques I made on my main.

PS: No, none of them are sugar-coated. Why? Because I'm blunt. I never said that anything was sugar-coated, and I did not confuse your critiques for comments. Your critiques are all on your message board, and they do not provide much. They're barely critiques at all, and are about as shallow as your teacher proofreading your paper. What about writing techniques and craft?