Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24962818-20160102183947/@comment-8777240-20160109185947

Codywife1 wrote: ImLonely wrote: IM STILL ALIVE wrote: I'm sorry, but I disagree with this new rule. While I understand it for the most part, look around. At least 70% of this Wiki is contributed to/occupied by someone slightly under 13, right? And yes, not all of them do the greatest things, but I think that can go for everyone of any age.

If we start banning underaged users (ok it's different if someone on here is like...7), this Wiki is really going to die down more than it has been.... and probably end up being left in the dust sometime later. That's a very good point Nikki. Animal jam is for kids. Yes, and MANY kids will explore this wiki a lot.

//sometimes the edgy ones

-edge intensifies-

GIMME YO RARES OR I CUT AND CALL AJHQ ON U

anyways...so are we going to continue using the maturity rule and allow users slightly under the age of 13? As long as they don't come out and admit it that is...